banks · scored in the scan of 2026-06-30
No live quote available for this name.
Market cap, P/E, P/B and dividend yield are computed at the live price, so they match what Google and Yahoo show. The fundamentals behind them (shares, earnings, book value) are point-in-time from EDGAR. All prices are unadjusted — the figures actually on the screen.
Last filed: 10-K on Mar 6, 2026
Has filed its next 10-Q between May 9 and May 12 in each of the last 4 years. (May 9 – 12, 2026)
That window is derived from this company's own filing history and recomputed each scan — where its same-quarter filing has landed, carried one cycle forward. It is not a schedule, and nothing here says when the company will actually file. See the filing calendar for the whole universe.
Cash dividends per share, as paid on their ex-dates — the trailing five years the record holds. A history of what was paid, not a statement about what the next payment does.
No dividends on record for FSUNin the trailing five years this table holds. The record's floor is 2016 — anything paid before it is outside what this site can testify to. That is a fact about the record, not a judgement — paying nothing is a capital-allocation choice.
| Period ending | 2025-12-31filed 2026-03-06 | 2025-09-30filed — | 2025-06-30filed — | 2025-03-31filed — | 2024-12-31filed 2026-03-06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income | $97.9M | — | — | — | $75.6M |
| Operating cash flow | $111.5M | — | — | — | $101.1M |
| Total assets | $8.49B |
The trailing record against the 2026-06-30 scan's prices, three lenses per metric: the value, its percentile among valid sector peers, and a z-score against the name's own ~5-year range. All of it is descriptive — where the numbers sit today, not where they are going. A metric that misleads in this sector says why instead of showing a number; an FY tag means the trailing year comes from an annual filing and can lag the latest quarter.
Each factor is rank-normalised against the other 2,449 names scored that day. The centre line is the universe median; right of it is better on that factor. The composite is the four, equally weighted.
Did not make this scan's shortlist — ranked 841 of 2,450 scored names. That is not a negative call: it is an absence of one. This ranking has no measurable predictive power: mean information coefficient 0.017 (t=1.21) over 113 months, and its top quintile did NOT beat a plain equal-weight portfolio even at zero trading cost (t=0.14). Tested on survivorship-free, point-in-time data. It is a starting point for research and NOT a buy signal.
| $8.44B |
| $8.22B |
| $8.10B |
| Total liabilities | $7.33B | $7.37B | $7.34B | $7.15B | $7.06B |
| Shareholders' equity | $1.15B | $1.13B | $1.10B | $1.07B | $1.04B |
Straight from SEC EDGAR, consolidated company totals. The filed date is when each number became publicly knowable — not the period it describes. About a third of EDGAR facts are restated comparatives printed inside a later filing, so the two dates are not interchangeable, and only one of them is a fact you could have acted on.
The price story over the trailing 252 sessions, computed from the dividend-adjusted (total-return) series. Beta is measured against our own equal-weight scored universe — the mean daily return of every scored name, not SPY or any index — so it says how the name moved against the average scored name, and it is not the beta Yahoo prints. The drawdown is total-return too: for a payer it is shallower than the price chart's, because the dividends cushion it.
Composite positions among valid sector peers — rankings of the facts above, not of opportunity. The backtest measured what rankings like these predict: nothing.
"—" means the figure was not computable from the filings (a loss-maker's P/E, an NM growth base) — deliberately blank, never guessed. "n/a" with a reason means the sector convention forbids the number outright. † marks an approximation, explained on hover.
