Filter the latest scan's published facts — sector, size, yield, valuation — or rank them with a preset: cheapest, fastest growing, most profitable. Every view shows what is in the filings and prices; none ranks opportunity. The model behind the statuses showed no predictive power, and nothing here is a recommendation.
Scan of 2026-06-30 · 2,450 names scored · prices as of that date
Cheapest
Lowest valid-in-sector trailing valuation multiples today, latest scan: each name's sector percentiles on earnings yield, FCF yield, P/S, P/B, P/TBV and P/CFO, averaged (only the metrics valid in its sector — a REIT is never ranked by GAAP P/E here). “Cheapest” is a fact about trailing multiples versus sector peers, not a forecast that they re-rate.
Tested the unforgiving way: a composite ranking built from these same point-in-time filings (2017-01-31 to 2026-05-29) showed no measurable predictive power (mean IC 0.0168, t = 1.21), and its top quintile did not beat holding everything even before costs. Ranks like these describe today's record; they do not predict tomorrow's return.
Never the absolute multiple alone. A P/E of 9 is a fact; whether it is low depends on what you hold it against.
Absolute
The figure itself, from trailing filings against today's price.
Sector percentile
Where it sits among validpeers in its own sector. On a preset this is the rank column itself — the composite is the mean of its components' sector percentiles, so it has no separate one.
Own 5-year range
Where it sits against its own history — the Own 5y column, in sigma.
The five-year window is the empirically privileged one. Cheap against its sector and cheap against its own history are different claims, and a stock can be one without being the other — which is the whole reason both columns are shown rather than blended into a single score.
Left out on purpose
Forward P/E, PEG, anything NTM
No SEC filing contains a forecast. Every forward multiple is somebody's estimate wearing a filing's authority.
EV/EBITDA
Long-term-debt tags cover about a third of the universe. A ranking computable for a third of the names is a lie of omission — the names with the tag would silently become the list.
P/B outside financials
Buybacks have pushed hundreds of sound companies to negative book equity. The ratio is meaningful for banks and misleading nearly everywhere else, so it is masked rather than printed.
Pigglet's screener re-cuts the same monthly scan shown everywhere else on this site and is provided for information only. It is not investment advice, not a recommendation to transact, and not personalised to your circumstances. The ranking behind the statuses was tested on survivorship-free, point-in-time data (2017-01-31 to 2026-05-29) and showed no measurable predictive power (mean IC 0.0168, t = 1.21); its top quintile did not beat a plain equal-weight portfolio even before trading costs. The metric presets rank descriptive facts about trailing filings and carry the same finding. Past performance does not predict future results.
"Cheap composite" is a 0–100 position among valid sector peers — the mean of the component metrics' sector percentiles. "—" means the scan published no figure, deliberately. "n/a — masked" means the metric is misleading in that name's sector (a REIT's GAAP P/E, a bank's FCF yield) — hover for the reason, which comes from the same sector-validity rules the composite itself respects. An FY tag marks a trailing-year figure built from an annual filing; hover for what that means.
